La variabilité à long terme
Dernier critère de l’analyse du RCF, la variabilité visuelle du RCF ou variabilité à long terme (VLT) est le critère essentiel.
La VLT, visible, est estimée par périodes de 1 minute hors accélérations et ralentissements. On distingue 4 classes de VLT : marquée ou saltatoire (> 25 bpm), normale (6 - 25 bpm), minime (< 6 bpm) et absente (< 2 bpm) (Fig. 1.36). Des épisodes brusques et erratiques de variabilité saltatoire de plus de 1 minute sont appelés "ZigZag pattern" (Fig. 1.39) (Gracia-Perez 2019[13]).
Références
- Ayres-de-Campos D., Costa-Santos C., Bernardes J., et SisPorto Multicentre Validation Study Group. Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: The antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 118 (1): 52–60, Jan. 2005. ISSN 0301-2115. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.013.
- Ayres-de-Campos D., Arulkumaran S., et FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 131 (1): 5–8, Oct. 2015a. ISSN 1879-3479. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.018.
- Ayres-de-Campos D., Spong C. Y., et Chandraharan E. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 131 (1): 13–24, 2015b. ISSN 0020-7292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020.
- Blackburn S. T. Prenatal period and placental physiology. Blackburn S. Maternal, Fetal & Neonatal Physiology: A Clinical Perspective (4th ed.). Washington: Elselvier, pages 61–114, 2013.
- Cerinato A. état des lieux sur la prise en charge des hémorragies foeto-maternelles au CHU de Caen depuis janvier 2009. https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01186573/document, 2015.
- Chandraharan E., Pereira S., Ghi T., Gracia Perez-Bonfils A., Fieni S., Jia Y.-J., Griffiths K., Sukumaran S., Ingram C., Reeves K., Bolten M., Loser K., Carreras E., Suy A., Garcia-Ruiz I., Galli L., et Zaima A. International expert consensus statement on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG) - First revision (2024). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 302: 346–355, Nov. 2024. ISSN 03012115. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.034.
- CNGOF. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : Modalités de surveillance fœtale pendant le travail, 2007.
- Doret M., Constans A., et Gaucherand P. Bases physiologiques de l'analyse du rythme cardiaque fœtal au cours du travail. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 39 (4): 276–283, 2010. ISSN 0368-2315.
- Ghosh M. et Chandraharan E. Unusual Fetal Heart Rate Patterns. In Handbook of CTG Interpretation: From Patterns to Physiology, pages 109–113. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2017.
- Gibb D. M. F. et Arulkumaran S. Control of fetal heart and NICE guidelines. In Fetal Monitoring in Practice, pages 27–44. Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, Edinburgh; New York, 2008. ISBN 978-0-7020-3294-3.
- Goncalves H., Rocha A. P., Ayres-de-Campos D., et Bernardes J. Internal versus external intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: The effect on linear and nonlinear parameters. Physiological Measurement, 27 (3): 307–319, Mar. 2006. ISSN 0967-3334, 1361-6579. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/27/3/008.
- Graca L. M., Cardoso C. G., et Calhaz-Jorge C. An approach to interpretation and classification of sinusoidal fetal heart rate patterns. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 27 (3): 203–212, Mar. 1988. ISSN 0301-2115. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(88)90124-4.
- Gracia-Perez-Bonfils A., Vigneswaran K., Cuadras D., et Chandraharan E. Does the saltatory pattern on cardiotocograph (CTG) trace really exist ? The ZigZag pattern as an alternative definition and its correlation with perinatal outcomes. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 34 (21): 3537–3545, 2019. ISSN 1476-7058, 1476-4954. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1686475. ↩
- Katz M., Meizner I., Shani N., et Insler V. Clinical significance of sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern. BJOG, 90 (9): 832–836, Sept. 1983. ISSN 1470-0328, 1471-0528. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb09323.x.
- Lindqvist P. G., Nasiell J., et Högberg U. Vasa praevia test can save lives in Swedish maternity wards. Lakartidningen, 108 (4): 150–151, Jan. 2011. ISSN 0023-7205.
- Loussert L., Berveiller P., Magadoux A., Allouche M., Vayssiere C., Garabedian C., et Guerby P. Association between marked fetal heart rate variability and neonatal acidosis: A prospective cohort study. BJOG, 130 (4): 407–414, Mar. 2023. ISSN 1470-0328, 1471-0528. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17345.
- Mari G., Deter R. L., Carpenter R. L., Rahman F., Zimmerman R., Moise K. J., Dorman K. F., Ludomirsky A., Gonzalez R., Gomez R., Oz U., Detti L., Copel J. A., Bahado-Singh R., Berry S., Martinez-Poyer J., et Blackwell S. C. Noninvasive Diagnosis by Doppler Ultrasonography of Fetal Anemia Due to Maternal Red-Cell Alloimmunization. N Engl J Med, 342 (1): 9–14, Jan. 2000. ISSN 0028-4793, 1533-4406. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001063420102.
- Marie C., Sinoquet C., Barasinski C., Lémery D., et Vendittelli F. Does maternal race influence the short-term variation of the fetal heart rate? An historical cohort study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 193: 102–107, Oct. 2015. ISSN 03012115. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.07.007.
- Martin C. B. Physiology and clinical use of fetal heart rate variability. Clinics in perinatology, 9 (2): 339–352, 1982. ISSN 0095-5108.
- Modanlou H. D. et Murata Y. Sinusoidal heart rate pattern: Reappraisal of its definition and clinical significance. J of Obstet and Gynaecol, 30 (3): 169–180, June 2004. ISSN 1341-8076, 1447-0756. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00186.x.
- Mulder E. J., Visser G. H., Bekedam D. J., et Prechtl H. F. Emergence of behavioural states in fetuses of type-1-diabetic women. Early Hum. Dev., 15 (4): 231–251, July 1987. ISSN 0378-3782.
- Murphy K. W., Russell V., Collins A., et Johnson P. The prevalence, aetiology and clinical significance of pseudo-sinusoidal fetal heart rate patterns in labour. BJOG, 98 (11): 1093–1101, Nov. 1991. ISSN 1470-0328, 1471-0528. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15360.x.
- Nijhuis J. G., Prechtl H. F., Martin C. B., et Bots R. S. Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? Early Hum. Dev., 6 (2): 177–195, Apr. 1982. ISSN 0378-3782.
- Nunes I., Ayres-de-Campos D., Costa-Santos C., et Bernardes J. Differences between external and internal fetal heart rate monitoring during the second stage of labor: A prospective observational study. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 42 (4): 493–498, 2014a. ISSN 1619-3997. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0281.
- Nunes I., Ayres-de-Campos D., Kwee A., et Rosén K. G. Prolonged saltatory fetal heart rate pattern leading to newborn metabolic acidosis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 41 (5): 507–511, 2014b. ISSN 0390-6663.
- Oyelese Y. Vasa previa. https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/decision-support-in-medicine/obstetrics-and-gynecology/vasa-previa/, Jan. 2019.
- Oyelese Y., Catanzarite V., Prefumo F., Lashley S., Schachter M., Tovbin Y., Goldstein V., et Smulian J. C. Vasa previa: The impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 103 (5 Part 1): 937–942, 2004.
- Pardey J., Moulden M., et Redman C. W. G. A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 186 (5): 1095–1103, May 2002. ISSN 0002-9378. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.122447.
- Parer J. T., King T., Flanders S., Fox M., et Kilpatrick S. J. Fetal acidemia and electronic fetal heart rate patterns: Is there evidence of an association? Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 19 (5): 289–294, Jan. 2006. ISSN 1476-7058, 1476-4954. doi: 10.1080/14767050500526172.
- Pereira S. et Chandraharan E. Recognition of chronic hypoxia and pre-existing foetal injury on the cardiotocograph (CTG) : Urgent need to think beyond the guidelines. Porto biomedical journal, 2 (4): 124–129, 2017.
- Peters C. H., ten Broeke E. D., Andriessen P., Vermeulen B., Berendsen R. C., Wijn P. F., et Oei S. G. Beat-to-beat detection of fetal heart rate: Doppler ultrasound cardiotocography compared to direct ECG cardiotocography in time and frequency domain. Physiological measurement, 25 (2): 585, 2004.
- Pézard P. et Boussion F. Troubles du rythme cardiaque foetal chap. 9. In Echocardiographie Fœtale, pages 349–359. Elsevier Masson, 2013.
- Preti M. et Chandraharan E. Importance of fetal heart rate cycling during the interpretation of the cardiotocograph (CTG). Int J Gynecol Reprod Sci, 1 (1): 10–12, 2018.
- Sarr A. et Marpeau L. Quelle interprétation du rythme cardiaque chez le fœtus d'origine noire africaine? La Revue Sage-Femme, 10 (1): 8–13, 2011. ISSN 1637-4088.
- Savirón-Cornudella R., Bielsa A. L., Esteban-Escaño J., Torres J. C., Ezquerro M. C., Larraz B. C., de Terán Martínez-Berganza E. D., Castaño M. J. R., Navidad M. Á., et García M. A. Diagnosis of cardiotocographic sinusoidal patterns by spectral analyses. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 93: 106174, 2024.
- Schifrin B. S. The CTG and the timing and mechanism of fetal neurological injuries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 18 (3): 437–456, June 2004. ISSN 1521-6934. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.03.001.
- Sinkey R. G., Odibo A. O., et Dashe J. S. SMFM # 37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 213 (5): 615–619, 2015.
- Sweha A., Hacker T. W., et Nuovo J. Interpretation of the electronic fetal heart rate during labor. American family physician, 59: 2487–2506, 1999. ISSN 0002-838X.
- Tarvonen M., Manninen M., Lamminaho P., Jehkonen P., Tuppurainen V., et Andersson S. Computer vision for identification of increased fetal heart variability in cardiotocogram. Neonatology, 121 (4): 460–467, 2024. ISSN 1661-7800, 1661-7819. doi: 10.1159/000538134.
- Tarvonen M. J., Lear C. A., Andersson S., Gunn A. J., et Teramo K. A. Increased variability of fetal heart rate during labour: A review of preclinical and clinical studies. BJOG, 129 (12): 2070–2081, Nov. 2022. ISSN 1470-0328, 1471-0528. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17234.
- Ugwumadu A. Are we (mis) guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 121 (9): 1063–1070, 2014. ISSN 1471-0528.
- Williams K. P. et Galerneau F. Intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns in the prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 188 (3): 820–823, Mar. 2003. ISSN 0002-9378.
- Yanamandra N. et Chandraharan E. Saltatory and sinusoidal fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns and significance of FHR ‘overshoots'. Current Women's Health Reviews, 9 (3): 175–182, 2013.
- Young B. K., Katz M., et Wilson S. J. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate: I. Clinical significance. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 136 (5): 587–593, 1980.
- Zhang W., Geris S., Al-Emara N., Ramadan G., Sotiriadis A., et Akolekar R. Vasa praevia: Perinatal outcome in pregnancies with a prenatal diagnosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020.